Comments on: Esoteric Shin Buddhism? http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/ My life as a father, Buddhist and Japanophile. Sat, 11 Jun 2011 01:53:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Juan http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-4001 Juan Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:12:31 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-4001 I have to give this blog post a 5 out of 5 stars. A great job showing the transformative power of the Jodo Shinshu path. :) gassho -juan I have to give this blog post a 5 out of 5 stars. A great job showing the transformative power of the Jodo Shinshu path. :)

gassho
-juan

]]>
By: Kyoushin http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-2603 Kyoushin Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:27:28 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-2603 I don't think that what you wrote was silly. It was more that I wanted to add in a bit of the conversation that got left out. Take care! K I don’t think that what you wrote was silly. It was more that I wanted to add in a bit of the conversation that got left out.

Take care! K

]]>
By: Doug http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-2601 Doug Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:01:49 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-2601 Wow, I kind of forgot all about this post (though it's popular with spam bots, no clue why). A lots changed for me since I wrote the silly thing. Anyways, I think you're right in that I don't want to play up the "esoteric" side of things too much. Interestingly though, as i study Shingon, I see lots of Shin elements in it, or is it the other way around? :) Namely the notion of "conferring" power upon a disciple is the main thing. In my "intro to shingon" post written a few months ago, I mentioned that the idea in Shingon is through devotion to a deity, that deity confers their wisdom or attributes to the disciple, and in a similar way, the disciple of Amida is "granted" his karmic benefits, and extinction of ignorance, so they're similar in that regard. All the rituals, mantras and such, however are most definitely not in Shin Buddhism. Anyways, it was a fun chat, and I appreciate your input on the subject! Wow, I kind of forgot all about this post (though it’s popular with spam bots, no clue why). A lots changed for me since I wrote the silly thing. Anyways, I think you’re right in that I don’t want to play up the “esoteric” side of things too much.

Interestingly though, as i study Shingon, I see lots of Shin elements in it, or is it the other way around? :) Namely the notion of “conferring” power upon a disciple is the main thing. In my “intro to shingon” post written a few months ago, I mentioned that the idea in Shingon is through devotion to a deity, that deity confers their wisdom or attributes to the disciple, and in a similar way, the disciple of Amida is “granted” his karmic benefits, and extinction of ignorance, so they’re similar in that regard.

All the rituals, mantras and such, however are most definitely not in Shin Buddhism.

Anyways, it was a fun chat, and I appreciate your input on the subject!

]]>
By: Kyoushin http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-2599 Kyoushin Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:14:47 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-2599 Hi Doug I've been meaning to respond to this ever since you wrote it and now it's a year later! What I was trying to say in the fascinating discussion we had when we met was not that Shin is 'esoteric' but rather that it has elements that seem like a kind of 'exoteric tantra'. You covered one part of this when you wrote about tantric ritual. I think that for many Shin followers the Dharmakara-Amida narrative, especially as embodied in chanting Sanbutsge and Juseige, plays a similar role. The other thing I had in mind was Shinran's fondness for this imagery: "Obstructions of karmic evil turn into virtues; It is like the relation of ice and water: The more the ice, the more the water; The more the obstructions, the more the virtues." This seems very similar to the tantric saying "'When there is more wood (passions) there is more fire" although Shin followers don't deliberately add wood to the fire ... just experience Amida's light melting the ice of karma in daily life. I guess what I was getting at is that Shin is a lot like tantra at times even though devotees don't need to see or know that. In that sense it has esoteric dimensions but is not esoteric in terms of the practitioner's path. Hi Doug I’ve been meaning to respond to this ever since you wrote it and now it’s a year later!

What I was trying to say in the fascinating discussion we had when we met was not that Shin is ‘esoteric’ but rather that it has elements that seem like a kind of ‘exoteric tantra’.

You covered one part of this when you wrote about tantric ritual. I think that for many Shin followers the Dharmakara-Amida narrative, especially as embodied in chanting Sanbutsge and Juseige, plays a similar role.

The other thing I had in mind was Shinran’s fondness for this imagery:

“Obstructions of karmic evil turn into virtues;
It is like the relation of ice and water:
The more the ice, the more the water;
The more the obstructions, the more the virtues.”

This seems very similar to the tantric saying “‘When there is more wood (passions) there is more fire” although Shin followers don’t deliberately add wood to the fire … just experience Amida’s light melting the ice of karma in daily life.

I guess what I was getting at is that Shin is a lot like tantra at times even though devotees don’t need to see or know that. In that sense it has esoteric dimensions but is not esoteric in terms of the practitioner’s path.

]]>
By: Gerald Ford http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-1851 Gerald Ford Thu, 01 May 2008 23:24:05 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-1851 Jeannie: Thanks much, as always. :) Dave F: Yeah a huge, huge part of Buddhism is just classic mind training. Train your mind enough with wholesome habits, and eventually you reach critical mass and have those habits ingrained. Oregonnerd: My wife tells me all the time I need to work on being less wordy, so I know your pain. ;) Jeannie: Thanks much, as always. :)

Dave F: Yeah a huge, huge part of Buddhism is just classic mind training. Train your mind enough with wholesome habits, and eventually you reach critical mass and have those habits ingrained.

Oregonnerd: My wife tells me all the time I need to work on being less wordy, so I know your pain. ;)

]]>
By: oregonnerd http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-1856 oregonnerd Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:40:12 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-1856 Thank you. I've been trying to master the art of unwordy words for a few years and must continue. zen I'd not call it, but then I'd prefer not to name it at all. So obliqueness if not impenetrability could conceivably be a shared trait between us. --anyway-- Glenn 8] Thank you. I’ve been trying to master the art of unwordy words for a few years and must continue. zen I’d not call it, but then I’d prefer not to name it at all. So obliqueness if not impenetrability could conceivably be a shared trait between us.

–anyway–

Glenn
8]

]]>
By: dave f. http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-1852 dave f. Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:37:01 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-1852 Hi Gerald: I found this posting to be very interesting. I think the metaphor of Kabuki used to describe tantric ritual is apt. This reminds me of Aristotle's notion that habit precedes understanding. Sometimes by acting "as if" we eventually ingrain in ourselves certain patterns of behavior and thinking that change us profoundly. We may not completely understand them at first but later time brings perspective. If we become attuned to the nembutsu in our lives and depend on Amida's vow it can transform us even before we totally understand it. That's what I'm hoping anyway . . . Hi Gerald:

I found this posting to be very interesting. I think the metaphor of Kabuki used to describe tantric ritual is apt. This reminds me of Aristotle’s notion that habit precedes understanding. Sometimes by acting “as if” we eventually ingrain in ourselves certain patterns of behavior and thinking that change us profoundly. We may not completely understand them at first but later time brings perspective. If we become attuned to the nembutsu in our lives and depend on Amida’s vow it can transform us even before we totally understand it. That’s what I’m hoping anyway . . .

]]>
By: Jeannie http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-1853 Jeannie Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:28:34 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-1853 <i>"How the blog post even managed to make the frontpage of Wordpress for today is beyond me though."</i> Fame at last!! :) <"The topic in question is intended for a Buddhist, namely a Pure Land Buddhist audience..."</i> Although I tend to identify as a Zen Buddhist, I have a very long background in Ch'an Buddhism. I truly enjoy your Pure Land posts, Gerald. Thank you for sharing your journey with me. :D “How the blog post even managed to make the frontpage of WordPress for today is beyond me though.”

Fame at last!! :)

<”The topic in question is intended for a Buddhist, namely a Pure Land Buddhist audience…”

Although I tend to identify as a Zen Buddhist, I have a very long background in Ch’an Buddhism. I truly enjoy your Pure Land posts, Gerald. Thank you for sharing your journey with me. :D

]]>
By: Gerald Ford http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-1854 Gerald Ford Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:05:33 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-1854 <em>As a poet I saw two writers, one quite poetic (though that’s not quite the word, it doesn’t exist in English) and the other quite scholarly. Conceivably each of your writers needs their own platform.</em> Um, no. :) There is only one writer, thanks. The topic in question is intended for a Buddhist, namely a Pure Land Buddhist audience, as evinced in other writings, and the overall "feel" of the blog, so that's why the topic may not be readily clear. How the blog post even managed to make the frontpage of Wordpress for today is beyond me though. :p Thanks and welcome to the L8B. As a poet I saw two writers, one quite poetic (though that’s not quite the word, it doesn’t exist in English) and the other quite scholarly. Conceivably each of your writers needs their own platform.

Um, no. :) There is only one writer, thanks. The topic in question is intended for a Buddhist, namely a Pure Land Buddhist audience, as evinced in other writings, and the overall “feel” of the blog, so that’s why the topic may not be readily clear. How the blog post even managed to make the frontpage of WordPress for today is beyond me though. :p

Thanks and welcome to the L8B.

]]>
By: oregonnerd http://japanlifeandreligion.com/2008/04/28/esoteric-shin-buddhism/#comment-1855 oregonnerd Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:35:40 +0000 http://nihonshukyo.wordpress.com/?p=219#comment-1855 I've several comments. The first is quite simple; this is relatively impenetrable to the outsider. Hopefully your first response would be "but I covered that in..." a post in your blog. If so, I'd hope to see links to it somewhere in the article. As a poet I saw two writers, one quite poetic (though that's not quite the word, it doesn't exist in English) and the other quite scholarly. Conceivably each of your writers needs their own platform. And thirdly--this is the sort of thing where I'd like to see interlinked knowledge somehow, not on wikipedia (the 'ring' concept of interlinked sites I've always found pretty clumsy as well), particularly between disciplines (you may well call it synergy, I call it similarity in cognitive patterning). I enjoyed this article, although I can't promise to ever read it again. My approach is, well, rather different in a great many ways--because I never could manage to conform. Again, thank you for your blog entry/article. --Glenn I’ve several comments. The first is quite simple; this is relatively impenetrable to the outsider. Hopefully your first response would be “but I covered that in…” a post in your blog. If so, I’d hope to see links to it somewhere in the article. As a poet I saw two writers, one quite poetic (though that’s not quite the word, it doesn’t exist in English) and the other quite scholarly. Conceivably each of your writers needs their own platform. And thirdly–this is the sort of thing where I’d like to see interlinked knowledge somehow, not on wikipedia (the ‘ring’ concept of interlinked sites I’ve always found pretty clumsy as well), particularly between disciplines (you may well call it synergy, I call it similarity in cognitive patterning). I enjoyed this article, although I can’t promise to ever read it again. My approach is, well, rather different in a great many ways–because I never could manage to conform.

Again, thank you for your blog entry/article.
–Glenn

]]>